Iraq is won
  • EvestayEvestay November 2008
    "Down with Barriers, Up with Iraq" by Michael Yon.
    On November 13th I covered a mission in south Baghdad with soldiers from the 4th Infantry Division. General Petraeus once told me during the height of the fighting, back when violence was the lingua franca and victory was very much in question, that this area was the canary in the mineshaft. In his exact words regarding what Lieutenant Colonel Pat Frank had to deal with in one of the toughest places in Iraq, “SW Baghdad...has every challenge imaginable -- AQI, JAM, micro-fault-lines, good/bad ISF partners, good/bad neighborhood leaders, and Route Irish! It will be the canary in the mineshaft; if they can pull it off, this will be doable....”

    It is critical to point out that General Petraeus told me this in 2007 – just at the crest of “the Surge” during some of the fiercest fighting in the war. Many people at home were saying the new strategy was a complete failure, but the Coalition and Iraqi soldiers were not tapping out, not taking a break, giving no quarter to the enemy, and expecting none in return.

    General Petraeus went on about what he was seeing, “Just back from a patrol base in Arab Jabour, SE of Baghdad, another incredible place. Was an AQI sanctuary three weeks ago. Now the head sheik has given four of his best men to the newly arrived Bn Cdr to help him find/kill/capture AQI in the AO. Very impressive/heartening.”

    I’ll finish this story where General Petraeus could not, because this was still at the height of combat, the war truly had just peaked and nobody knew this yet. A year later, in June 2008, I e-mailed to Gary Sinise:

    “I bet you 5 bucks it will end this year. Probably a few casualties for us still, but that by early 2009, a reasonable person will say it's over.”

    Gary e-mailed back, asking if that was what I really thought, and my responding e-mail response was candid and informal:

    “Just a gut instinct, Gary. I've spent so much time all over that war that I've developed an instinct for it that's becoming more and more accurate. I predicted the civil war back in Feb 2005, more than a year ahead of anyone else. During 2005, I was saying and writing that AQI was intentionally trying to start it. Identified General Petraeus in 2005-2006 as a man that I thought could lead us out of this mess...maybe! In about January or February 2007, I wrote that General Petraeus was the man we needed but it might be too late. In about early July 2007, I came on Huge Hewitt radio show and said the surge was working. I thought I was the first to say that, but I believe that Hugh said that John Burns had just noticed same thing. In 2006, I wrote from Afghanistan that we were losing the war there and that 2007 would be a lot worse (got huge flak for that, but was sadly correct). 2007 got a lot worse in Afghanistan, and this year looks to be worst so far.

    Now to Iraq: every indicator to me is that we are winning the Iraq war at an ever increasing rate. In about January, I predicted in writing a couple months of higher casualties before it would begin to settle down. That is what has been happening. May 2008 was the best month in the war. We lost 19. 19 too many, but much less than has been the norm. AQI is being defeated ([Redacted] is at this moment in the middle of it.) This is shaping up into a strategic defeat for al Qaeda, not just AQI. I first started writing this in about July 2007; people thought I was nuts. Now it's being widely recognized that al Qaeda global is being devastated. (Though they will continue to kill us, and especially be a problem in places like Afghanistan.) The loss in Afghanistan and also their crimes against humanity are sending shockwaves through the Arab and Islamic world. If anyone hates al Qaeda more than Americans, it's Iraqis and some others who have suffered under them.

    Now to Iraq again: I believe that by the end of this year, there is a very high chance that a reasonable observer will be able to say, "The Iraq war has ended." This does not mean that we will not take a small number of casualties each month, but that the war will end and we can switch to helping Iraq stand, and truly start to bring more of our folks home. Touch wood.

    Our biggest wild card are Shia militias, but we see that the government is standing up to them. Also, support for the militias has diminished as AQI was crushed down and Sunni militias mostly ended their attacks. (We just need to make sure no knuckleheads use the Koran for target practice, or commit any crimes against Iraqis.) The Iraqi Army gets stronger by the month, and are increasingly reliable. The defections in Basra did not surprise me. Those are the worst soldiers I've seen in Iraq, and also the newest. That would not have happened in Mosul or Diyala or Baghdad, for instance. I expected poor performance in Basra, but amazingly, they completed their mission anyway. That they were able to penetrate Sadr City is excellent. Expect more fighting there, but make no mistake, many Shia are as sick of JAM (Shia militias) as they are of AQI. Support for Shia militias has diminished greatly because they mistreated their own people and behaved criminally even toward other Shia.

    I am increasingly confident about Iraq. Was telling [redacted] the other day that our next challenge is with certain journalists. I am in daily contact with journalists in Iraq and some of them do not want to let the war go. The war has lofted them into positions that they did not previously have (like me, for instance), and some of them do not want to let it go. I can see it. On the one hand, it's clear they want it to end, but on the other, it's the highlight of their careers. I have not discussed this with the journalists, but I have noticed the pattern in their communications. They seem almost worried that it's ending. Remember the book, "My War Gone By, I Miss it So"?

    Anthony Loyd was a journalist who clearly missed his war. I am detecting this with a number of the key voices in Iraq. This could affect coverage and needs to be addressed.

    Otherwise, I am increasingly confident. I think we are going to make it. Petraeus worked like magic. Now we need him to concentrate on our growing troubles in Afghanistan.

    Knock on wood!

    It’s difficult to convey the level of violence that happened in South Baghdad during the period in 2007 when General Petraeus e-mailed to me those prophetic words. The “Dragon Brigade” in South Baghdad lost 100 soldiers who were killed in action (KIA) and more than 800 were wounded during their 14 months of fighting. And that was the least of it. Iraqi forces were taking heavier casualties, and bodies of civilians littered the roads just about every day. Each day brought its car bombs, rockets, snipers, EFPs (very deadly bombs apparently from Iran), giant Humvee-shattering bombs, bodies found with hands bound behind their backs with bullet holes in their heads, or throats slit, headless bodies and bodiless heads. It was not uncommon to see dogs cleaning flesh off of freshly killed skulls. Mosques and churches were flattened. Market places were leveled. Neighborhoods were abandoned. One morning our soldiers were greeted by a human head, carefully placed in the middle of the road. Yet the Iraqis never quit, and neither did our people.

    Last week, in this November of 2008, I was in a Humvee with a fine group of men, including: SGT Jason McInerney from Connecticut, who was on his second Iraq tour; Specialist Jason Cooper, a medic on his second Iraq tour hailing from “Central Texas:” and Specialist Mack Pinson from Lincoln Park, Michigan. Mack is on his first tour.

    Sometimes folks get upset when these pages don’t mention the exact unit, but there is a reason for the shorthand: many readers are international, or have little knowledge of the military, and many do not know the difference between the Army and the Marines, much less the various Special Operations Forces. Since readers from dozens of countries visit this site each day – and I thank you for that! – I try to keep it straightforward. But out of respect for the soldiers, here goes with the unit name: this mission was with Troop C, 7th Squadron, 10th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Multi-National Division Baghdad.

    As we rolled out from dusty Forward Operating Base (FOB) Falcon, I asked how many casualties the unit had taken since they had arrived, from Fort Hood (Texas), in March, 2008. The soldiers told me that one Humvee had taken an EFP strike, but that a Private Rafael Martinez had received only a ruptured eardrum.

    It represents vast progress to observe that the current rotation in 2008 has lost only two soldiers to an EFP strike. As sad as those loses are, the extreme distinction over the 100 lost in the Dragon Brigade from the previous year is immense and exultant. The area has fallen nearly completely silent. The war has ended. The canary in the mineshaft survived. It is starting to chirp and it is just a matter of time before it begins to sing.

    One battalion in the Dragon Brigade was the 2-12 Infantry, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Stephen Michael. His right hand man, Command Sergeant Major Charles Sasser, was open to and confident with the press, and provided more than just combat expertise. I went on missions with his men, who spent important time educating me about their area when they could have been sleeping. LTC Michael is a native of Guyana in South America. The Guyanese are famously soft-spoken. In fact, Major Kirk Luedeke said of LTC Michael, “Soft spoken guy, but an extremely bright and tenacious fighter.” It was true. The commander seemed gentle and grandfatherly, but he commanded his units with great expertise in what must have been one of the most complicated areas in Iraq. LTC Michael’s battalion took 18 KIAs and more than 150 wounded, mostly during the “surge.” (2-12 was one of the battalions in the Dragon Brigade.) The 2-12’s old area has fallen quiet now. The soldiers accomplished their mission, though I doubt anyone will ever know how hard worked.

    For the record, out of respect it’s important to mention the battalions who fought the last tour and tamed South Baghdad. I asked Major Kirk Luedeke who was there, working as the Public Affairs Officer in this troubled area. Major Luedeke wrote:

    “Our organic maneuver units were: 1-28 IN (LTC Pat Frank, 1-4 CAV (LTC Jim Crider). Our 2-16th IN and 2-32 FA were in East Baghdad and Mansour with other BCTs. Attached to us were: 1-18 IN (LTC George Glaze), 2-12 IN (LTC Stephen Michael), 4-64 AR (LTC Johnnie Johnson- they replaced 1-18 IN in Nov) and 2-4 IN (LTC Tim Watson who replaced 2-12 IN on Christmas eve) and a Stryker Cav Squadron 2-2 SCR (LTC Myron Reineke). We also had the following Stryker battalions attached to us during clearing ops in W. Rashid and Dora: 1-23 IN, 2-3 IN (from the 3/2 SBCT), and 2-23 IN (from 4/2 SBCT).

    Later in the day, I rode around south Baghdad and saw Martinez, the soldier whose eardrum was ruptured in a bomb strike. Martinez was smiling. I asked if he could hear me, as I chuckled, and Martinez just laughed and started cracking jokes. The other soldiers joked with him about the EFP strike. In short, morale remains high in this rotation, despite the fact that there is no fighting going on. (Realize that a workhorse is mostly happy when it’s allowed to do its job, and the same goes for a soldier.) They talked about another casualty in which a power cable snapped off from a large power structure and crashed down, whacking a soldier on the head. Luckily he was wearing a helmet. The soldiers said that it knocked him for a loop, but he returned to duty. Chalk one up for Murphy’s Law. Murphy's Law is about the only constant in Iraq and Afghanistan – but even that seems to be operating at slighter levels now.

    Today's mission – observing the progress of the peace – makes for boring journalism, but it made me very happy. I was smiling all day. This victory, like all real triumphs, is monumental and historic – though our military will not be allowed to express their feelings of pride and sense of well-earned glory.

    When the war was on full-steam there was so much to report that it was impossible to keep track. And now that peace is breaking out, it’s equally impossible to keep track of all the progress. There’s still focus on the attacks, most of which are directed against Iraqis, not us. And so this “mission” was more like an armed errand to remove some concrete barriers between neighborhoods.

    When it comes to creating the conditions for peace in Iraq, details matter. Of course the surge and change of tactics were central to change that flipped the situation; and the Anbar Awakening was critical. But it is important to understand the role of smaller, tactical improvements. Though they were heavily criticized at the time by observers, the installation of thousands of barriers around Baghdad are one of the most unrecognized tools of success in the restoration of peace in Iraq. In 2006, bombs were killing thousands of people. Al Qaeda, in particular, was trying to foment civil war and they were succeeding. When they murdered large numbers of Shia, for instance, other Shia would pour out of their neighborhood and murder large numbers of Sunnis in a flash of revenge. The barriers thwarted these flows of vengeance and baffled the violence.

    Installing the miles of ugly concrete barriers was like patching up the internal bleeding of Baghdad – the heart of Iraq. The barriers did not “solve” the problem any more than a bandage cures a bullet wound, yet bandages saved lives. Removing these concrete barriers will be like removing the bandages to allow real healing to take place. We are only starting now, and it may take years before they are all gone.

    There are many untold details contributing to the growing success on the ground – including the United States’ decision to put the “Sons of Iraq” (SOI) on our payroll until they could be handled by the Iraqi government – which just this month began to pay the SOIs. This program, criticized for creating "militias," gave former enemies a sense of purpose and allowed them to assist in the progress. Where are those who screamed about “America’s Militias” now that Iraq has hired those same people and is absorbing many into the police and army?

    Chalk another one up for the military leaders for standing their ground. When the barriers went up, it was a sign that we were trying to get a grip on the civil war, and it was “exciting news” to some in the “further evidence of failure.” But when I stood and watched some of the barriers being taken down, the only camera there was mine.

    Along the way on the morning of this 13 November mission, an eagle-eyed soldier in a different Humvee spotted a suspected IED; a cinder block placed atop a T-barrier. The EOD bomb experts were dispatched. Traditionally it would take hours for the bomb squad to show up, but they don’t have as much to do these days, and so the 752nd EOD company from Fort Hood arrived in about 45 minutes. While we waited for EOD, the two veterans in the Humvee were candid the way veterans tend to be. Both of them admitted to not caring about Iraqis on their first combat tour, because all they saw were attacks. But now they don’t have to fight with Iraqis and have gotten to know many by name. The soldiers realize that the Iraqis are a lot like we are, and they wish the Iraqis the best.

    After EOD arrived, I talked with one of the MP escorts, SGT Jeremiah Norton, who today is serving a second Iraq tour. SGT Norton said that as late as March 2008, they were getting 10 to 15 EOD calls per day in the area, and many or most were real bombs. But now, EOD personnel sometimes don’t get a single call all day, and most calls end up having no bombs at all. Every sign I see, every little spot report like this, indicate the same thing: The war is over.

    The words from General Petraeus about Southwest Baghdad will always stick with me: “It will be the canary in the mineshaft; if they can pull it off, this will be doable...”

    The General was right…and the canary lives to sing for another day.
  • NunesNunes November 2008
    God I hate that guy, and not for the opinions he holds. But hey, he's right. But I still think we would've gotten here faster if we hadn't spent the last 20 something months pointing guns at anything that moved funny and paying people not to shoot at one another. Those sorts of things don't really scream "stability" to the local population...

    But that entire article was Mike Yon blowing his own horn and name/credential dropping... "you can trust me because I was there (along with many, many other people with a variety of other opinions) and because I have made unverified predictions that have come true in the past. And he spends the whole time he ISN'T talking about himself, talking about all the little things that have slowly changed over the past 20 months or so from terrible to better and now declaring that THIS is the moment where the war can be declared a victory! Let's get our boys home.

    /he sounds like a cut&runner to me!

    edit: This is all really good news though. I just think this guy is full of crap and most likely blinded by his jingoistic sense of honor and patriotism... Being correct this time doesn't really change that for me.
  • GovernorGovernor November 2008
    Let me put my feelings about the huge waste that is the Iraq war aside for a moment and talk about this as if I actually cared about the progress in the country:

    In a very superficial sense, I can see how people would cheer at the progress we've made in Iraq in recent months. I'm not blind to the decelerating monthly death tolls nor the increases in responsibilities that are being shifted to the Iraqi security forces. But once you wade past those figures, the overall picture in the middle east is a far sadder tale. The US Army is quick to take credit for the changes in Iraq, and we're quick to announce that we've unified Iraq in a struggle against terrorists or whatever. But we largely abandoned all of our other efforts in the region to make that success possible. Pakistan is hemorrhaging ever-increasing terrorist activity, Afghanistan is in a worse state now than it was during the initial invasion and the Taliban is making marked progress in reclaiming large portions of the country, and Al Qaeda is still recruiting, training, and funding their efforts with large support from within Saudi Arabia.

    If a mayor was in charge of cutting down crime in a city, and they sanctioned off a small portion of center city and put the entire police force there effectively eliminating crime from that area, they'd be run out of office for ignoring the rest of the city while it succumbed to crime and mayhem. Yet, when we do exactly that only on a slightly larger scale half-way around the world, we cry victory and pat each other on the back for a job well done? Sounds like a load of bullshit to me.

    With that out of the way, I am happy to return to my actual opinion on the matter: who the fuck cares what the progress in Iraq is? Paving the streets with gold won't suddenly make everything better. 2011 is 8 years and 4000+ deaths too late.
  • EvestayEvestay November 2008
    ANunes, I think Yon is extremely trustworthy and looks at the situation with as little bias as possible. He has spent the most time embedded in Iraq than any other reported and instead of sitting around the base he constantly goes out on the missions with soldiers. He is ex-special forces so he is able to go into battle situations when other reporters would not. He was not "jingoistic" about Iraq until we started winning and he pointed that out repeatedly in the past by criticizing our tactics. Now he is in Afghanistan and is reporting that we are losing. He admits it will be much more difficult to push forward success in Afghanistan than it was in Iraq. He is happy General Petraeus has been appointed leader of the Middle East region and hopes he can work his counter-insurgency magic in Afghanistan. However, at the moment, things look grim.

    Gov, you are right on the money. Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia (and Iran) are huge contributors to the present chaos in the Middle East. And while your analogy with cordoning off part of a city to keep it safe while the rest of the city goes to shit is correct, I think the effect may be different. We can now move on from Iraq to push for more stability elsewhere and hopefully Iraq is so fundamentally changed that we will not have to mess with it again. We don't have to engage the afforementioned nations to get them to stop allowing terrorist activity..we can instead use diplomatic/economic pressure and the example of a thriving Iraq next door to push them to move towards modernity and the benefits of global capitalism.

    One counter-insurgency strategy is the ink-blot strategy. It says you should place your forces in certain sections of a country and try to fundamentally change those sections. Once you clear (insurgents), hold (the area and train up locals to do the same without you) and build (up infrastructure to prove success to locals) you can move on to the next sections of the country to fix up (it might be easier since they have the example of a neighbor city thriving and can buy into the strategy) and hopefully the area you just cleared will remain stable. Extrapolate the strategy to an entire region and maybe we can hope Iraq will remain stable while we try to get others to follow suit either through pointing to Iraq as an example of what they could have or through diplomatic/economic pressure.

    Another example is some police experiment in Kansas City. They took one particularly violent section of the city and assigned a new strategy for stablizing it. They put like three times the cops who walked beats instead of staying in cars. They authorized the cops to stop people for any reason possible (any minor violation) in order to search for guns. They gathered as many guns as possible through this strategy. This caused gun crimes/ violent crimes to go way down and even when they took away the extra cops the gun crimes still stayed low. They didn't keep using the strategy throughout the entire city as it was just an experiment, but perhaps it could have transformed section by section of the city to make the whole city stable. (ps this might show that gun control is good, but how many of those confisgated guns did the owners legally own and have registered? guns in responsible peoples' hands hurts nobody image/wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> )
  • NunesNunes November 2008
    I just think this whole concept of a nice friendly democratic middle east is a fools errand. While we had our thumbs up our asses in Iraq (not nuclear capable), India (nuclear capable) and Pakistan (nuclear capable) have been rattling each others cages. Pakistan has a huge stability problem to which we provided little to no support and this makes it a great place to hide out and fuck up America's allies. Every time shit like Mumbai happens I'm WAY more terrified than I've ever been of terrorists HERE.

    I think America can have responsibilities around the world. Promoting democracy is not one of them. Promoting stable government? Maybe.

    /edit: I realize Yon is a really knowledgeable guy. I just don't like the way he presents himself through his writing and style.
  • ScabdatesScabdates November 2008
    A journalist being trustworthy and looking at a situation with as little bias as possible?

  • Black+BalloonBlack Balloon December 2008
    Edward R. Murrow.
  • AlfyAlfy December 2008
    Why are we there again?
  • GovernorGovernor December 2008
    QUOTE (Alfy @ Dec 1 2008, 06:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Why are we there again?

  • AlfyAlfy December 2008
    Oh, thats right, I forgot that Iraq has/had the infrastructure to create WMD's. My bad.
This discussion has been closed.
← All Discussions

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership