Pelosi Power Play
  • NunesNunes January 2009
    link
    Text:
    QUOTE
    House Democrats are poised to approve new rules that will significantly increase their authority while taking the bullets out of the few legislative weapons Republicans have in the lower chamber.

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has approved the changes from the last Congress, when House GOP members frustrated their Democratic counterparts by winning over two dozen amendment battles on the floor.

    Pelosi’s move has set up a divisive mood on the first day of the 111th Congress, which Republicans say runs counter to the tone set by President-elect Obama.

    Republican leaders intend to fight the rules changes, which would curtail their ability to delay legislation by forcing Democrats to take politically difficult votes.

    “This is not the kind of openness and transparency that President-elect Obama promised,” the GOP leaders wrote Monday in a letter to Pelosi.

    Republican leadership aides say the changes will make it easier for the Speaker to run the House and protect vulnerable House Democrats.

    But Democratic leadership sources dispute the GOP characterizations, noting that Republicans will still have an opportunity to offer an amendment to bills on the floor, though they won’t have the ability to invoke an arcane rule that would in effect kill the entire underlying measure.

    Democrats say GOP assertions that Republicans would not be able to offer a “motion to recommit” are false. They say they are removing the “Catch-22” that Republicans have exploited to force embarrassing votes on issues such as gun control and illegal immigration.

    The rules package also calls for the end of six-year term limits for committee chairmen. This move is not popular with younger members, but panel chairmen have been pressing for the change since Democratic leaders surprisingly kept the six-year limits intact in their rules package for the 110th Congress.

    The change means that House chairmen could be in their posts until they retire or die.

    The six-year limit was initially adopted after House Republicans took control of the lower chamber in 1995. That ended the seniority-based system that Democrats had embraced for decades.

    Democratic aides argue, however, that term limits under Republican rule meant that the committee member who raises the most money would be rewarded with a chairmanship.

    Seniority was a factor in the awarding of GOP committee chairmanships between 1995 and 2006, though fundraising is seen as vital on both sides of the aisle. For example, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee will apply political pressure on members who are lagging in their committee dues.

    Democrats were scheduled to meet Monday evening to discuss the rules package before an anticipated vote on Tuesday. Democratic aides at press time said there could be changes made to the package before the vote.

    Republican leadership aides expect that their members will strongly contest the rules package. Opposition tactics could include offering motions to adjourn and walking out of the House chamber.


    I guess some background may be in order...
    For the last two years, the motion to recommit has been used by house republicans to kill bills by motioning for a recommit with some loaded extra language and then report it back to the house in a manner described as "prompt." By "prompt" they meant ... never. The changes being suggested are to prevent this "prompt" motion, and instead only allow the other 2 methods. The first being a Motion to Recommit without revisions. The other is a Motion to Recommit with instructions to make changes "forthwith" which translates to "now."
  • scrubblescrubble January 2009
    i'm outraged.
  • BudweiserBudweiser January 2009
    Gawd those evil Republicans, going to be so much better without them being able to do much of anything but watch! I mean really, arcane rules, embarrassing votes on issues such as gun control and illegal immigration..and on and on. So much the better to have Nacy and Harry moving things along for us...what a breath of fresh air this is all going to be, can hardley wait!
  • NunesNunes January 2009
    QUOTE (Budweiser @ Jan 13 2009, 11:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Gawd those evil Republicans, going to be so much better without them being able to do much of anything but watch! I mean really, arcane rules, embarrassing votes on issues such as gun control and illegal immigration..and on and on. So much the better to have Nacy and Harry moving things along for us...what a breath of fresh air this is all going to be, can hardley wait!


    This isn't about Republican's being evil, or Nancy and Harry forcing stuff through the halls. This is about being able to talk about issues from either side without the minority (which isn't always gonna be those republicans you know) being able to completely derail a bill for the sake of scoring political points in their states. This rule change, which is in the process of being executed according to the letter of the law, and doesn't hamstring the minority's ability to block, change, or otherwise participate with the legislation, but rather focuses on improving the entire house's ability to stay focused and accomplish something. Which is what we pay them for, after all. It's not like the new rule is, "republican's can't talk". It's more like, "The minority is now required to file a motion to recommit immediately upon it's announcement with or without changes, instead of being able to MtR the thing into the trash can because they didn't want to have to talk about it on an election year."
This discussion has been closed.
← All Discussions

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership