House Passes Bailout!
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    article

    QUOTE
    Overall, the CBO said, "the bill as a whole would increase the budget deficit over the next decade."
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    YEY! House declines the $700 billion bill for the $800 billion bill. Nice job waiting for the newer model.

    Pork is yummy. What did we get here in Pa? It wasn't the wooden arrows thing, was it?

    On a side note: Rep. Pitts didn't vote for it, but Rep. Gerlach changed his vote from a no (Monday) to a yea (today). Both Senators Casey and Specter voted for the bill.
  • Black+BalloonBlack Balloon October 2008
    While at this point I think it did need to be passed, I worry that it may have been done too hastily. I'm in the process of reading through the bill right now. It's a lose-lose situation, but it seems to me it'd be better to take the path of an increased deficit and damaged economy than awaiting complete economic collapse.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    I'm more pissed about the absolute farce they are calling oversight and a guarantee of returns for us the investors.

    Basically, call for the president to suggest to congress that they consider voting on those issues at some point sometime. Sure... that'll happen...
  • Black+BalloonBlack Balloon October 2008
    The oversight bit does bug me, having just read over it. The SEC and the Federal Reserve are, to my mind, corrupt. And new boards are being formed with the people who lead those respective groups gaining immediate control over the new ones as well? It's irksome.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    Basically it's 700 billion dollars with a bunch of words attached to it. Complete horseshit. And our congress had to bribed into doing it. Or were bribed into doing it depending on your perspective.

    "I will write that program. But only if you promise to decrease taxes on my family." would get my ass in trouble if I were serious, if not fired.

    Horse.Shit.
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    Let us play quote the congressman/woman/person

    "I voted against a bad bailout bill on Monday, and will now vote for a better rescue plan, not because I like it or want to, but because we fought as hard as we could for more reforms," Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tennessee

    "I don't want to have to vote for this bill, and I'm not defending it," ... "It's full of things that I don't believe in." Rep. Sue Myrick, R-North Carolina
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    Dow's down 125 points. Just took a 150 point plunge in the last 20 minutes.

    Since the bailout was passed in the house it's dropped over 200 points.
    I guess a link would be nice.
  • mungomungo October 2008
    QUOTE (ANunes @ Oct 3 2008, 03:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Dow's down 125 points. Just took a 150 point plunge in the last 20 minutes.

    Since the bailout was passed in the house it's dropped over 200 points.
    I guess a link would be nice.


    That doesn't neccessarily mean that the street hasn't accepted the bailout. The market was previously priced with the acceptance of the bailout. I can't go into details, but I will when I can.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    I wasn't really trying to say this means the bailout failed. More that the market's idiotic.

    THEY DIDN"T PASS THE BAILOUT! SELL SELL SELL!
    THEY JUST MORTGAGED OUR CHILDRENS FUTURES! SELL SELL SELL!

    I don't get it.

    /I don't think they do either

    edit:
    bush just signed it. It's official.

    Now another article about how maybe this won't help at all!
  • GovernorGovernor October 2008
    Sigh.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    Care to elaborate on your sigh?

    Ross Perot's Plan was better.

    /Restructure the regulations surrounding some of the facets of the market that are actually causing the crazy ups and downs first, then work on your actual plan.
    //It's a tourniquet, like the bailout, but it doesn't cost 700bn dollars.
    ///Too late now...

    edit:
    Actually I just love Perot

    CHARTSCHARTSCHARTS
  • GovernorGovernor October 2008
    There's nothing really to elaborate on... congress fucked us again.

    On a related note, I will not be voting for Obama nor McCain come November.
  • redboneredbone October 2008
    QUOTE (Governor @ Oct 4 2008, 06:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    There's nothing really to elaborate on... congress fucked us again.

    On a related note, I will not be voting for Obama nor McCain come November.


    Are you going to join me in not voting? Or do you have someone else in mind that you are thinking of supporting.
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    I think Court would be a Bob Barr guy. If not, I'd think Nader. I don't think he'd be voting Baldwin.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    One should also look up the roll call for their congresscritters to see how they voted.

    My two senators Bob Casey and Arlen Spector voted Yea and my Rep. Pitts voted Nay.

    I already hate Spector for the spectacle he made about steroids in sports... But Bob Casey just took a pretty big hit IMO. Pitts gets knocked up a peg.
  • GovernorGovernor October 2008
    Casey was always a tool. He's an unprincipled democrat who often swings to the worst principles of the modern republican party.

    In reply to redbone, I will always vote. It is definitely true that one vote will almost certainly change nothing, but it is even more true that no vote will definitely do nothing. There are plenty of awesome candidates out there. Some are even officially running for president. Personally, I will almost certainly vote for Barr, but if he wasn't in the race, I could always write in someone better.

    Not voting is simply an acceptance of laziness, which is something I never want to do.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    Yeah I just haven't been paying a whole lot of attention to my senators, so I don't know a whole lot about either. But now neither gets a vote.

    /I should read about their opposition though, to make sure they aren't worse...
    //-_- fuckin' pathetic that that's a legitimate concern
  • KPKP October 2008
    QUOTE (Governor @ Oct 5 2008, 01:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Casey was always a tool. He's an unprincipled democrat who often swings to the worst principles of the modern republican party.

    In reply to redbone, I will always vote. It is definitely true that one vote will almost certainly change nothing, but it is even more true that no vote will definitely do nothing. There are plenty of awesome candidates out there. Some are even officially running for president. Personally, I will almost certainly vote for Barr, but if he wasn't in the race, I could always write in someone better.

    Not voting is simply an acceptance of laziness, which is something I never want to do.


    I second the Barr vote. Too bad everytime I ask someone about voting someone other than the Democrat or Republican candidate all they say is "why would you waste your vote" and all I want to reply with is "because I don't like them, and I like this guy?"

    Not that my vote will count or anything.


  • GovernorGovernor October 2008
    I hardly see it as a wasted vote when both the democratic and republican candidates are awful.
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    Soooo... When is the DOW supposed to rise?
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    ha
    hahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHA
    *gasp*
    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

    it's dropped below 10,000. -350 atm.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    9,831.49 atm

    500 point drop now.

    9,824.96
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    QQ

    So, the Wallstreet may reject the bill, because it has the potential to hurt the upper crust of the companies. So, now the few things that I liked about the bill are not going to get implemented.
  • GovernorGovernor October 2008
    Wait, isn't that a good thing? The bill sucks, and the banks think they can get through the current financial crisis without its help, just as we all want them to do anyway.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    OOOOO. Now banks that might not need the help won't just abuse it. Those poor companies.

    The market will be fine, we will hemorrhage money for a month or two but people still clearly have money.

    The Dow dipped below 9750 for about 2 microseconds before SHOOTING back up to over 9850. People are just gaming it a little differently in light of the crisis. If it's falling, why not let it fall further than you might otherwise. Everyone else is... Then it's cheaper to buy right?

    /Let's see how far down the rabbit hole goes.
    //Maybe I'll be able to afford stock someday after all?
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    QUOTE (Governor @ Oct 6 2008, 11:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Wait, isn't that a good thing? The bill sucks, and the banks think they can get through the current financial crisis without its help, just as we all want them to do anyway.


    It is... as long as there is no $700 billion dollars being printed/spent. I don't know what congress will do with the bill if no one accepts it.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    I'm sure Paulson will think of something to blow it on.
  • GovernorGovernor October 2008
    I don't know why I never really thought of this, but is there an expiration on this bill?
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    No. Yes. Dec. 31, 2009 actually.

    Go go Gadget readthebill.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    above 10k again! market's CRAZY today.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    Markets are on the up atm. Apparently the fact that our government is willing to give companies "loans" without having to adhere to the executive compensation part of the bailout bill made some execs more willing to sell.

    I BARELY UNDERSTAND THIS BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE THE STUPIDEST THING I'VE EVER SEEN A GOVERNMENT DO. EVER.
  • Dow's down over 300 ATM. Sorry, but the bailout isnt' going to correct the fundemental flaws of the US's pseudocapitalistic economic system.
  • JeddHamptonJeddHampton October 2008
    I like it: pseudocapitalistic. That is quite fitting.
  • NunesNunes October 2008
    QUOTE (Working Class Hero @ Oct 7 2008, 02:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Dow's down over 300 ATM. Sorry, but the bailout isnt' going to correct the fundemental flaws of the US's pseudocapitalistic economic system.


    But it will pay for fun parties for all the execs who created this mess in the first place.

    /no golden parachute, but free reign over taxpayer money as long as you work there... sweet.
    //Maybe I should just be happy for them and move on with my life.
    ///Been thinkin about Sirius XM stock.
This discussion has been closed.
← All Discussions

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership